<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 341 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111178</link>
    <description>Proof of due service of the statutory notice at the company&#039;s registered office is essential before a winding-up petition for inability to pay debts can succeed. The court noted that service by under postal certificate was a weak mode and the registered post acknowledgment was not produced, so compliance with section 434 was not established. On the material before it, the respondent&#039;s position suggested financial difficulty rather than a case for winding up, and the grounds under sections 433(e) and 433(f) were not made out. The application for appointment of a provisional liquidator also could not survive. The petition was dismissed, with liberty reserved to file a fresh petition if the debt remained unpaid after the notice period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:21:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 341 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111178</link>
      <description>Proof of due service of the statutory notice at the company&#039;s registered office is essential before a winding-up petition for inability to pay debts can succeed. The court noted that service by under postal certificate was a weak mode and the registered post acknowledgment was not produced, so compliance with section 434 was not established. On the material before it, the respondent&#039;s position suggested financial difficulty rather than a case for winding up, and the grounds under sections 433(e) and 433(f) were not made out. The application for appointment of a provisional liquidator also could not survive. The petition was dismissed, with liberty reserved to file a fresh petition if the debt remained unpaid after the notice period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>