https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111176 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to comply with the deposit requirement set by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal. The appellant claimed compliance by making various payments, but the respondent argued that these did not meet the conditions. The court directed the appellant to deposit the specified amounts as required, with assurance from the appellant's counsel. Failure to comply would result in the appeal's dismissal. The court emphasized the importance of meeting the deposit conditions for the appeal to be heard on its merits. en-us Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111176 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to comply with the deposit requirement set by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal. The appellant claimed compliance by making various payments, but the respondent argued that these did not meet the conditions. The court directed the appellant to deposit the specified amounts as required, with assurance from the appellant's counsel. Failure to comply would result in the appeal's dismissal. The court emphasized the importance of meeting the deposit conditions for the appeal to be heard on its merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111176