<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 308 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111145</link>
    <description>The High Court of Rajasthan granted the application for dispensing with the requirement to hold meetings of shareholders and creditors for the approval of a scheme of amalgamation between Rajasthan Telecom Company Limited and Shyam Basic Infrastructure Projects Private Limited. Shareholders and creditors had provided a &#039;no objection,&#039; and the court found merit in the petitioner&#039;s request based on compliance with legal requirements. Consequently, the court dispensed with the necessity of holding such meetings, relying on the evidence presented by the petitioner transferor company, and disposed of the application with specified directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:53:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 308 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111145</link>
      <description>The High Court of Rajasthan granted the application for dispensing with the requirement to hold meetings of shareholders and creditors for the approval of a scheme of amalgamation between Rajasthan Telecom Company Limited and Shyam Basic Infrastructure Projects Private Limited. Shareholders and creditors had provided a &#039;no objection,&#039; and the court found merit in the petitioner&#039;s request based on compliance with legal requirements. Consequently, the court dispensed with the necessity of holding such meetings, relying on the evidence presented by the petitioner transferor company, and disposed of the application with specified directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>