<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 475 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111144</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) Order-in-Appeal regarding the confiscation of goods under the Small Scale Industries (SSI) exemption notification. It was held that manufacturers under the SSI exemption were not obligated to maintain statutory records. The respondents, operating under the SSI exemption, were found compliant with simplified record-keeping requirements and did not exceed the exemption limit. Therefore, the confiscation was set aside, emphasizing the importance of adherence to regulatory frameworks to avoid confiscation based on record-keeping discrepancies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:50:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 475 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111144</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) Order-in-Appeal regarding the confiscation of goods under the Small Scale Industries (SSI) exemption notification. It was held that manufacturers under the SSI exemption were not obligated to maintain statutory records. The respondents, operating under the SSI exemption, were found compliant with simplified record-keeping requirements and did not exceed the exemption limit. Therefore, the confiscation was set aside, emphasizing the importance of adherence to regulatory frameworks to avoid confiscation based on record-keeping discrepancies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>