<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 483 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111129</link>
    <description>The court determined that the High Court at Allahabad lacked jurisdiction to entertain a winding-up petition for a company registered in Lucknow. Analyzing notifications under the Amalgamation Order, the court found that a specific notification restoring Lucknow Bench&#039;s jurisdiction in company matters up to winding-up stage was overlooked in previous judgments. Emphasizing that jurisdiction hinges on the cause of action&#039;s location, the court held that the petition should be presented before the Lucknow Bench due to the company&#039;s registered office being in Lucknow. The petition filed in Allahabad was deemed not maintainable, and the court directed its return to the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:47:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 483 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111129</link>
      <description>The court determined that the High Court at Allahabad lacked jurisdiction to entertain a winding-up petition for a company registered in Lucknow. Analyzing notifications under the Amalgamation Order, the court found that a specific notification restoring Lucknow Bench&#039;s jurisdiction in company matters up to winding-up stage was overlooked in previous judgments. Emphasizing that jurisdiction hinges on the cause of action&#039;s location, the court held that the petition should be presented before the Lucknow Bench due to the company&#039;s registered office being in Lucknow. The petition filed in Allahabad was deemed not maintainable, and the court directed its return to the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>