<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 480 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111123</link>
    <description>A complaint concerning company-related rights was not rejected for want of locus standi where an operative civil court order had recognised the complainant&#039;s entitlement and remained unstayed. Participation in annual general body meetings also supported the connection with the company. On those materials, the statutory objection under the Companies Act did not defeat maintainability, and the Magistrate had sufficient basis to issue process under the criminal procedure framework. The threshold challenge therefore failed, and the criminal proceedings were permitted to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:34:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 480 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111123</link>
      <description>A complaint concerning company-related rights was not rejected for want of locus standi where an operative civil court order had recognised the complainant&#039;s entitlement and remained unstayed. Participation in annual general body meetings also supported the connection with the company. On those materials, the statutory objection under the Companies Act did not defeat maintainability, and the Magistrate had sufficient basis to issue process under the criminal procedure framework. The threshold challenge therefore failed, and the criminal proceedings were permitted to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>