<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 479 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111112</link>
    <description>On re-adjudication after remand for fresh consideration and hearing, the demand was enhanced from the reduced figure in the earlier order to the full amount proposed in the show cause notice. That enlargement of the demand, viewed in light of the limited scope of the remand, was treated as a strong prima facie case in favour of the applicants. On that basis, stay of recovery was granted and pre-deposit was waived.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:30:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 479 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111112</link>
      <description>On re-adjudication after remand for fresh consideration and hearing, the demand was enhanced from the reduced figure in the earlier order to the full amount proposed in the show cause notice. That enlargement of the demand, viewed in light of the limited scope of the remand, was treated as a strong prima facie case in favour of the applicants. On that basis, stay of recovery was granted and pre-deposit was waived.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>