https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111107 The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the initial order for violating principles of natural justice and remanded the matter for a fresh decision. Despite a subsequent order by the Deputy Commissioner withdrawing the facility for fortnightly payment, it was again set aside for being based on an invalid prior order. The Tribunal upheld the decision that the facility could only be withdrawn from the date of communication of the order, considering the penalty already faced by the respondents. The Appeal by the Revenue was rejected, and the cross-objection by the Respondents was disposed of. en-us Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:16:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111107 The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the initial order for violating principles of natural justice and remanded the matter for a fresh decision. Despite a subsequent order by the Deputy Commissioner withdrawing the facility for fortnightly payment, it was again set aside for being based on an invalid prior order. The Tribunal upheld the decision that the facility could only be withdrawn from the date of communication of the order, considering the penalty already faced by the respondents. The Appeal by the Revenue was rejected, and the cross-objection by the Respondents was disposed of. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111107