<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 259 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111056</link>
    <description>Statutory compliance for amalgamation was found satisfied where notices were duly served and published, the Official Liquidator and Regional Director were heard, no stakeholder objection survived, and no disqualifying circumstance or undisclosed material fact was shown. The scheme was therefore sanctioned. On accounting treatment, the amalgamation was treated as one in the nature of merger, so AS-14 required the identity of reserves to be preserved. The surplus and resultant reserves could not be reclassified contrary to the standard, and reserves available for distribution before amalgamation remained available after amalgamation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:05:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 259 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111056</link>
      <description>Statutory compliance for amalgamation was found satisfied where notices were duly served and published, the Official Liquidator and Regional Director were heard, no stakeholder objection survived, and no disqualifying circumstance or undisclosed material fact was shown. The scheme was therefore sanctioned. On accounting treatment, the amalgamation was treated as one in the nature of merger, so AS-14 required the identity of reserves to be preserved. The surplus and resultant reserves could not be reclassified contrary to the standard, and reserves available for distribution before amalgamation remained available after amalgamation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>