<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 463 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111048</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that &#039;Photoner&#039; qualified as a raw material under Customs Notification No. 11/97-Cus. despite not being fully consumed. Emphasizing the item&#039;s essential role in the manufacturing process, the Tribunal rejected the Commissioner&#039;s argument requiring complete consumption for classification as raw material. Citing relevant precedents, the Tribunal broadened the interpretation of raw materials, focusing on their significance in production rather than complete consumption. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and granted the appellant the benefits under the customs notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:49:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 463 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111048</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that &#039;Photoner&#039; qualified as a raw material under Customs Notification No. 11/97-Cus. despite not being fully consumed. Emphasizing the item&#039;s essential role in the manufacturing process, the Tribunal rejected the Commissioner&#039;s argument requiring complete consumption for classification as raw material. Citing relevant precedents, the Tribunal broadened the interpretation of raw materials, focusing on their significance in production rather than complete consumption. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and granted the appellant the benefits under the customs notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>