<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 260 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111038</link>
    <description>Civil court jurisdiction is barred once a secured creditor initiates enforcement measures under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. Enforcement disputes fall within the Debts Recovery Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction, and an aggrieved person must use the statutory remedy rather than seek an injunction from a civil court. Temporary injunction also requires a prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury. Failure to establish the claimed character of secured property, non-joinder of necessary parties, and suppression of material loan and mortgage facts defeat interim relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:34:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 260 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111038</link>
      <description>Civil court jurisdiction is barred once a secured creditor initiates enforcement measures under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. Enforcement disputes fall within the Debts Recovery Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction, and an aggrieved person must use the statutory remedy rather than seek an injunction from a civil court. Temporary injunction also requires a prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury. Failure to establish the claimed character of secured property, non-joinder of necessary parties, and suppression of material loan and mortgage facts defeat interim relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>