<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 258 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111036</link>
    <description>The court held that UTI was not a separate class of secured creditors, approved the fair and reasonable Corporate Debt Restructuring (CDR) scheme, allowed the petitioner company to implement the scheme before court sanction, and found the petition timely filed within the limitation period. The court approved the scheme of arrangement and ordered filing with the Registrar of Companies within 14 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:29:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 258 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111036</link>
      <description>The court held that UTI was not a separate class of secured creditors, approved the fair and reasonable Corporate Debt Restructuring (CDR) scheme, allowed the petitioner company to implement the scheme before court sanction, and found the petition timely filed within the limitation period. The court approved the scheme of arrangement and ordered filing with the Registrar of Companies within 14 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>