<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 285 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111027</link>
    <description>The court approved the Scheme of arrangement/merger/amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act. The Scheme was found to be in the interest of the companies&#039; stakeholders, with no legal irregularities noted. Shareholders and creditors had unanimously approved the Scheme, leading the court to grant sanction, emphasizing the importance of respecting such approvals unless legal violations are evident. The court highlighted the administrative nature of the Scheme, focusing on operational improvements and cost reduction without prejudicing the rights of shareholders or creditors. Approval was subject to the Transferor Company obtaining similar sanction from the Delhi High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:48:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 285 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111027</link>
      <description>The court approved the Scheme of arrangement/merger/amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act. The Scheme was found to be in the interest of the companies&#039; stakeholders, with no legal irregularities noted. Shareholders and creditors had unanimously approved the Scheme, leading the court to grant sanction, emphasizing the importance of respecting such approvals unless legal violations are evident. The court highlighted the administrative nature of the Scheme, focusing on operational improvements and cost reduction without prejudicing the rights of shareholders or creditors. Approval was subject to the Transferor Company obtaining similar sanction from the Delhi High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>