<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 313 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111012</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s decision in a case involving forfeiture of shares, allegations of oppression and mismanagement, increase of capital without notice, validity of meetings, unlawful allotment of bonus shares, and lease of company property. The court dismissed both appeals, restoring the original shareholding and management structure, finding no merit in contentions regarding unpaid calls and forfeiture of shares, supporting findings of oppression and mismanagement, and leaving certain issues for resolution through legal channels or shareholder meetings. No costs were awarded, and a three-week stay of judgment operation was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:55:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 313 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111012</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s decision in a case involving forfeiture of shares, allegations of oppression and mismanagement, increase of capital without notice, validity of meetings, unlawful allotment of bonus shares, and lease of company property. The court dismissed both appeals, restoring the original shareholding and management structure, finding no merit in contentions regarding unpaid calls and forfeiture of shares, supporting findings of oppression and mismanagement, and leaving certain issues for resolution through legal channels or shareholder meetings. No costs were awarded, and a three-week stay of judgment operation was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>