https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110997 A writ challenge to the same Company Law Board order was treated as barred by constructive res judicata because the objection could have been raised in earlier proceedings, and parallel resort to another remedy was viewed as an abuse of process that would undermine finality and risk conflicting decisions. On the bench-composition issue, the text states that the petitioner relied on outdated regulations; the amended regulatory regime, read with the relevant order under section 10E(4B) of the Companies Act, 1956, permitted the matter to be dealt with by a bench of one or more members. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable and was dismissed. en-us Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:12:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110997 A writ challenge to the same Company Law Board order was treated as barred by constructive res judicata because the objection could have been raised in earlier proceedings, and parallel resort to another remedy was viewed as an abuse of process that would undermine finality and risk conflicting decisions. On the bench-composition issue, the text states that the petitioner relied on outdated regulations; the amended regulatory regime, read with the relevant order under section 10E(4B) of the Companies Act, 1956, permitted the matter to be dealt with by a bench of one or more members. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable and was dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110997