<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 307 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110993</link>
    <description>The High Court held that once it sanctions a scheme of amalgamation with a name change, the Registrar of Companies cannot demand separate compliance with section 21 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Court emphasized that the Registrar cannot impose conditions not included in the Court&#039;s order and directed the Registrar to issue the name change certificate based on the Court&#039;s sanction within 10 days, without requiring compliance with section 21.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:54:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 307 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110993</link>
      <description>The High Court held that once it sanctions a scheme of amalgamation with a name change, the Registrar of Companies cannot demand separate compliance with section 21 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Court emphasized that the Registrar cannot impose conditions not included in the Court&#039;s order and directed the Registrar to issue the name change certificate based on the Court&#039;s sanction within 10 days, without requiring compliance with section 21.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>