https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110988 The court held that the civil court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit filed by the plaintiffs seeking declarations and injunctions related to ownership and transfer of shares, director appointments, and resolutions. Relying on precedent, the court concluded that the civil court's jurisdiction is not ousted merely by the applicability of the Companies Act, emphasizing that individual common law rights can be adjudicated in civil court. The court rejected the defendants' argument, allowing the civil court proceedings to continue and granting a stay for further relief if needed. en-us Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:48:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110988 The court held that the civil court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit filed by the plaintiffs seeking declarations and injunctions related to ownership and transfer of shares, director appointments, and resolutions. Relying on precedent, the court concluded that the civil court's jurisdiction is not ousted merely by the applicability of the Companies Act, emphasizing that individual common law rights can be adjudicated in civil court. The court rejected the defendants' argument, allowing the civil court proceedings to continue and granting a stay for further relief if needed. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110988