https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110987 Attached properties were not protected from sale merely because the appellant's tax appeals were pending, as no stay of recovery had been granted by the Tribunal. The Court nevertheless granted limited equitable protection for the claimed family residence by directing that the other identified properties be proceeded against first, and that the residential flat be sold only if their sale proceeds proved insufficient. The appellant remained free to seek stay from the Tribunal, and any stay granted there would govern recovery. The order was confined to the four specified properties. Impleadment by alleged mortgagees was refused, with liberty to approach the Special Court. en-us Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110987 Attached properties were not protected from sale merely because the appellant's tax appeals were pending, as no stay of recovery had been granted by the Tribunal. The Court nevertheless granted limited equitable protection for the claimed family residence by directing that the other identified properties be proceeded against first, and that the residential flat be sold only if their sale proceeds proved insufficient. The appellant remained free to seek stay from the Tribunal, and any stay granted there would govern recovery. The order was confined to the four specified properties. Impleadment by alleged mortgagees was refused, with liberty to approach the Special Court. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110987