<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 393 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110963</link>
    <description>The court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation between the transferor and transferee companies, approving the merger under specified terms and conditions. The objection raised by the Regional Director regarding the amendment of the memorandum of association was rejected, with the court citing section 391 of the Companies Act as sufficient for necessary alterations. All statutory procedures and public notices were found to be in compliance, with approval and consent obtained from creditors and shareholders. The court ordered the dissolution of the transferor company without winding up, noting the expected improvement in the financial structure of the transferee company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:55:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 393 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110963</link>
      <description>The court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation between the transferor and transferee companies, approving the merger under specified terms and conditions. The objection raised by the Regional Director regarding the amendment of the memorandum of association was rejected, with the court citing section 391 of the Companies Act as sufficient for necessary alterations. All statutory procedures and public notices were found to be in compliance, with approval and consent obtained from creditors and shareholders. The court ordered the dissolution of the transferor company without winding up, noting the expected improvement in the financial structure of the transferee company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>