https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110945 Territorial jurisdiction under Section 20(b) was upheld where the company's registered head office and part of its business activity were at Coimbatore, and some defendants also resided there; the absence of an exclusive jurisdiction clause for Erode meant part of the cause of action supported suit in Coimbatore. Representative impleadment under Order 1, Rule 8 was also sustained because no material showed that D-6 was incapable of representing the other shareholders, and the rule was treated as enabling rather than prohibitive at the threshold. No material irregularity was shown in the trial court's orders, so the revisions failed and the suit was allowed to proceed at Coimbatore. en-us Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:51:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110945 Territorial jurisdiction under Section 20(b) was upheld where the company's registered head office and part of its business activity were at Coimbatore, and some defendants also resided there; the absence of an exclusive jurisdiction clause for Erode meant part of the cause of action supported suit in Coimbatore. Representative impleadment under Order 1, Rule 8 was also sustained because no material showed that D-6 was incapable of representing the other shareholders, and the rule was treated as enabling rather than prohibitive at the threshold. No material irregularity was shown in the trial court's orders, so the revisions failed and the suit was allowed to proceed at Coimbatore. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110945