<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 446 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110940</link>
    <description>Thrust bearing assemblies used in P.D. pumps were held to fall under Heading 84.83 as bearing assemblies, not under Heading 84.82 as ball or roller bearings or under Heading 84.13 as pump parts. The analysis applied Chapter Note 2 of Section XVI, requiring classification by the specific tariff heading first, and relied on the Heading 84.82 text and HSN notes to reject the department&#039;s view that machinery parts incorporating bearings could be treated as bearings themselves. Because the assemblies were separately classifiable as bearing assemblies, the demand and penalty based on the alternative classification were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 446 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110940</link>
      <description>Thrust bearing assemblies used in P.D. pumps were held to fall under Heading 84.83 as bearing assemblies, not under Heading 84.82 as ball or roller bearings or under Heading 84.13 as pump parts. The analysis applied Chapter Note 2 of Section XVI, requiring classification by the specific tariff heading first, and relied on the Heading 84.82 text and HSN notes to reject the department&#039;s view that machinery parts incorporating bearings could be treated as bearings themselves. Because the assemblies were separately classifiable as bearing assemblies, the demand and penalty based on the alternative classification were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>