<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 436 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110923</link>
    <description>Refund of excise duty was not available where the order fixing annual capacity of production remained operative and had not been challenged or set aside. The claim also failed because the duty was paid without following the prescribed protest procedure under the excise rules, weakening the basis for refund. Further, the claimant did not discharge the statutory burden under the presumption against passing on the incidence of duty. On these combined grounds, the refund claim was held unsustainable and the assessee was denied relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:15:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 436 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110923</link>
      <description>Refund of excise duty was not available where the order fixing annual capacity of production remained operative and had not been challenged or set aside. The claim also failed because the duty was paid without following the prescribed protest procedure under the excise rules, weakening the basis for refund. Further, the claimant did not discharge the statutory burden under the presumption against passing on the incidence of duty. On these combined grounds, the refund claim was held unsustainable and the assessee was denied relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>