<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 375 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110919</link>
    <description>A direction under section 340 CrPC for prosecution based on alleged offences affecting a document produced in proceedings was held not appealable under section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court also held that section 341 CrPC provides an appeal only against an order refusing to make a complaint, not against a direction to initiate criminal process. Initiation of contempt proceedings was likewise not open to challenge under section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, because that provision applies only after punishment for contempt is imposed. The appeal was therefore not maintainable and was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:06:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 375 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110919</link>
      <description>A direction under section 340 CrPC for prosecution based on alleged offences affecting a document produced in proceedings was held not appealable under section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court also held that section 341 CrPC provides an appeal only against an order refusing to make a complaint, not against a direction to initiate criminal process. Initiation of contempt proceedings was likewise not open to challenge under section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, because that provision applies only after punishment for contempt is imposed. The appeal was therefore not maintainable and was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>