<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 228 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110899</link>
    <description>Registration of a sick industrial company&#039;s reference under the rehabilitation law triggers the statutory stay under section 22(1), preventing continuation of winding-up proceedings and coercive enforcement of a settlement amount. The statutory rehabilitation regime prevails even where the settlement may otherwise be enforceable as a decree, and equitable considerations or company-court execution powers cannot override the moratorium. Recovery may be pursued only with leave from the BIFR, preserving the company&#039;s protection pending rehabilitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:02:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 228 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110899</link>
      <description>Registration of a sick industrial company&#039;s reference under the rehabilitation law triggers the statutory stay under section 22(1), preventing continuation of winding-up proceedings and coercive enforcement of a settlement amount. The statutory rehabilitation regime prevails even where the settlement may otherwise be enforceable as a decree, and equitable considerations or company-court execution powers cannot override the moratorium. Recovery may be pursued only with leave from the BIFR, preserving the company&#039;s protection pending rehabilitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>