<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 283 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110893</link>
    <description>An attachment in revenue recovery proceedings does not by itself create an enforceable charge over a company&#039;s property in liquidation. Unregistered charges under the Companies Act, 1956 remain void against the liquidator and creditors, and the scheme of the Companies Act prevails unless a special statute clearly overrides it. The Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968 did not convert the dues into Government dues, so section 537(2) did not apply. In the absence of a clear overriding provision, the creditor was required to proceed under section 446 and obtain the company court&#039;s leave before sale of the attached properties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 283 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110893</link>
      <description>An attachment in revenue recovery proceedings does not by itself create an enforceable charge over a company&#039;s property in liquidation. Unregistered charges under the Companies Act, 1956 remain void against the liquidator and creditors, and the scheme of the Companies Act prevails unless a special statute clearly overrides it. The Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968 did not convert the dues into Government dues, so section 537(2) did not apply. In the absence of a clear overriding provision, the creditor was required to proceed under section 446 and obtain the company court&#039;s leave before sale of the attached properties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>