https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110890 The High Court clarified that the Company Court's jurisdiction must be explicitly provided for in the Companies Act and cannot be assumed. It emphasized the need for specific provisions granting jurisdiction, aligning with decisions from other High Courts. The Court held that the Company Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain an application under section 84(4) of the Companies Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The original application's findings were deemed irrelevant for future proceedings due to the jurisdictional issue. en-us Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:44:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110890 The High Court clarified that the Company Court's jurisdiction must be explicitly provided for in the Companies Act and cannot be assumed. It emphasized the need for specific provisions granting jurisdiction, aligning with decisions from other High Courts. The Court held that the Company Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain an application under section 84(4) of the Companies Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The original application's findings were deemed irrelevant for future proceedings due to the jurisdictional issue. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110890