https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110882 The High Court held that supervisory interference under Article 227 was not warranted against the MRTP Commission's decision to defer ruling on the admissibility of affidavits, documents and related objections until final hearing. Objections based on verification defects, non-production of originals and evidentiary value went to admissibility, but the tribunal retained discretion to decide them later, particularly where cross-examination was already extensive and could aid assessment. The Court noted that the cited Supreme Court authority favoured prompt objections to evidence, but did not require an immediate ruling in every case. The Commission's interlocutory case-management choice was therefore upheld. en-us Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:16:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110882 The High Court held that supervisory interference under Article 227 was not warranted against the MRTP Commission's decision to defer ruling on the admissibility of affidavits, documents and related objections until final hearing. Objections based on verification defects, non-production of originals and evidentiary value went to admissibility, but the tribunal retained discretion to decide them later, particularly where cross-examination was already extensive and could aid assessment. The Court noted that the cited Supreme Court authority favoured prompt objections to evidence, but did not require an immediate ruling in every case. The Commission's interlocutory case-management choice was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110882