<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 408 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110873</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) decision to allow Modvat credit on CR coils to respondents was deemed legally unsound due to insufficient evidence supporting the decision. The court set aside the order and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of thorough analysis and verification of facts in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:57:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 408 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110873</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) decision to allow Modvat credit on CR coils to respondents was deemed legally unsound due to insufficient evidence supporting the decision. The court set aside the order and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of thorough analysis and verification of facts in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>