<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 510 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110867</link>
    <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, involved misdeclaration of value in the Bill of Entry for a machine and software, leading to the imposition of fines and penalties under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal found that no specific value was declared for the software, and as a result, ordered the appeal to be allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellants by overturning the redemption fine and penalty imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:47:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 510 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110867</link>
      <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, involved misdeclaration of value in the Bill of Entry for a machine and software, leading to the imposition of fines and penalties under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal found that no specific value was declared for the software, and as a result, ordered the appeal to be allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellants by overturning the redemption fine and penalty imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>