https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110861 On repeal and re-enactment, proceedings saved under FERA carried forward the corresponding right of appeal under FEMA. Section 49 of FEMA preserved actions taken under the repealed regime and could not be construed to extinguish that vested appellate remedy. The appellate scheme under FEMA therefore had to be read so that appeals from adjudication orders of the Assistant Director or Deputy Director under FERA were routed to the corresponding forum, namely the Special Director (Appeals), rather than left without a remedy. A construction that denied such appeals was rejected because it would nullify the saved right of appeal. en-us Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:32:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110861 On repeal and re-enactment, proceedings saved under FERA carried forward the corresponding right of appeal under FEMA. Section 49 of FEMA preserved actions taken under the repealed regime and could not be construed to extinguish that vested appellate remedy. The appellate scheme under FEMA therefore had to be read so that appeals from adjudication orders of the Assistant Director or Deputy Director under FERA were routed to the corresponding forum, namely the Special Director (Appeals), rather than left without a remedy. A construction that denied such appeals was rejected because it would nullify the saved right of appeal. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110861