<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 324 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110858</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision in a case involving a winding up petition, emphasizing substantial compliance with procedural rules. The Court allowed the respondent to file a fresh affidavit to rectify a verification defect, deeming it not fatal. The appeal was dismissed, with the Court stating that procedural rules should advance justice, not impede it. The Company Court was directed to proceed with the winding up petition promptly, highlighting the importance of rectifying procedural defects for the efficient administration of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 324 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110858</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision in a case involving a winding up petition, emphasizing substantial compliance with procedural rules. The Court allowed the respondent to file a fresh affidavit to rectify a verification defect, deeming it not fatal. The appeal was dismissed, with the Court stating that procedural rules should advance justice, not impede it. The Company Court was directed to proceed with the winding up petition promptly, highlighting the importance of rectifying procedural defects for the efficient administration of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>