<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 633 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110856</link>
    <description>On the departmental circular and the material before it, the CESTAT held that the Superintendent was not the proper officer to issue the show cause notice alleging suppression or fraud. The Tribunal accepted that the notice lacked authority and did not examine the merits of the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:21:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 633 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110856</link>
      <description>On the departmental circular and the material before it, the CESTAT held that the Superintendent was not the proper officer to issue the show cause notice alleging suppression or fraud. The Tribunal accepted that the notice lacked authority and did not examine the merits of the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>