<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 504 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110853</link>
    <description>Classification of lead anodes depends on the HSN distinction between electroplating anodes and cast anodes for electrolytic refining: purity and the function of impurities are decisive, and shape, hooks, or stated end-use are not enough without supporting test evidence. Where the Revenue cannot prove the ingredients of the proposed tariff heading, reclassification cannot be sustained. If the classification basis fails, the extended period of limitation also lacks support, and consequential duty demand and penalty cannot survive. The note therefore confirms that tariff classification must rest on affirmative technical material, not assumptions from appearance or use.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:20:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 504 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110853</link>
      <description>Classification of lead anodes depends on the HSN distinction between electroplating anodes and cast anodes for electrolytic refining: purity and the function of impurities are decisive, and shape, hooks, or stated end-use are not enough without supporting test evidence. Where the Revenue cannot prove the ingredients of the proposed tariff heading, reclassification cannot be sustained. If the classification basis fails, the extended period of limitation also lacks support, and consequential duty demand and penalty cannot survive. The note therefore confirms that tariff classification must rest on affirmative technical material, not assumptions from appearance or use.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>