<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 193 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110844</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the CLB, dismissing the appeal. The deletion of Articles 8 and 9 of the Company&#039;s Articles of Association was deemed justifiable to prevent arbitrary membership inductions. The petition was rejected due to delay, lack of valid consent, and absence of oppression or mismanagement under the Companies Act, 1956. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:03:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 193 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110844</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the CLB, dismissing the appeal. The deletion of Articles 8 and 9 of the Company&#039;s Articles of Association was deemed justifiable to prevent arbitrary membership inductions. The petition was rejected due to delay, lack of valid consent, and absence of oppression or mismanagement under the Companies Act, 1956. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>