<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 498 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110841</link>
    <description>Duty demand for molasses found short in storage cannot be sustained unless the assessee&#039;s remission application is first decided by the competent authority through a speaking order after hearing the assessee. An internal communication or mere intimation of rejection is not a lawful substitute for a reasoned decision. Because the remission claim was pending and had not been determined in accordance with law, the demand based on the alleged shortage could not validly be confirmed. The matter required reconsideration by the Commissioner, with a proper hearing and a fresh determination of duty liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:58:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 498 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110841</link>
      <description>Duty demand for molasses found short in storage cannot be sustained unless the assessee&#039;s remission application is first decided by the competent authority through a speaking order after hearing the assessee. An internal communication or mere intimation of rejection is not a lawful substitute for a reasoned decision. Because the remission claim was pending and had not been determined in accordance with law, the demand based on the alleged shortage could not validly be confirmed. The matter required reconsideration by the Commissioner, with a proper hearing and a fresh determination of duty liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>