<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 494 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110836</link>
    <description>Boiler ash was treated as equivalent to cinder for excise purposes, following Supreme Court authority that had already settled the position. On that basis, boiler ash could not be subjected to duty on a contrary classification. The assessee therefore succeeded, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:52:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 494 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110836</link>
      <description>Boiler ash was treated as equivalent to cinder for excise purposes, following Supreme Court authority that had already settled the position. On that basis, boiler ash could not be subjected to duty on a contrary classification. The assessee therefore succeeded, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>