<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 492 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110834</link>
    <description>Clearance of damaged capital goods as waste and scrap on payment of duty did not justify compulsory reversal of Modvat credit, because Rule 57S(2)(c) covered capital goods sold as waste and scrap without distinguishing the cause of scrap generation. In the absence of any express provision requiring proportionate reversal, recovery of part of the credit could not be sustained, and the demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:50:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 492 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110834</link>
      <description>Clearance of damaged capital goods as waste and scrap on payment of duty did not justify compulsory reversal of Modvat credit, because Rule 57S(2)(c) covered capital goods sold as waste and scrap without distinguishing the cause of scrap generation. In the absence of any express provision requiring proportionate reversal, recovery of part of the credit could not be sustained, and the demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>