<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 485 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110818</link>
    <description>Availment of Modvat credit does not, by itself, strip inputs of their duty-paid character. On that reasoning, waste arising during manufacture from such inputs could not be excluded from the benefit of Notification No. 14/92 unless the notification expressly so provided. The Tribunal relied on earlier authority and applied a strict construction of the exemption notification according to its own language, finding no words that denied the benefit on credit availment. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to the Commissioner&#039;s view therefore failed, and the assessee&#039;s entitlement under the notification was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:14:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 485 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110818</link>
      <description>Availment of Modvat credit does not, by itself, strip inputs of their duty-paid character. On that reasoning, waste arising during manufacture from such inputs could not be excluded from the benefit of Notification No. 14/92 unless the notification expressly so provided. The Tribunal relied on earlier authority and applied a strict construction of the exemption notification according to its own language, finding no words that denied the benefit on credit availment. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to the Commissioner&#039;s view therefore failed, and the assessee&#039;s entitlement under the notification was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>