<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 481 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110813</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the entitlement to interest under Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962 for the delay in sanctioning the refund claim. Interest was calculated from the date exceeding 3 months from the assent of the president to the Finance Bill, 1995. The critical dates of application and sanction were pivotal in determining the interest liability period, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:03:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 481 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110813</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the entitlement to interest under Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962 for the delay in sanctioning the refund claim. Interest was calculated from the date exceeding 3 months from the assent of the president to the Finance Bill, 1995. The critical dates of application and sanction were pivotal in determining the interest liability period, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>