<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 479 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110809</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the jurisdiction of the adjudicating Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) and dismissed the appeals challenging both jurisdiction and the impugned order regarding the import of goods under the DEEC Scheme in contravention of the EXIM Policy. The Tribunal&#039;s detailed analysis of the relevant notification and statutory provisions supported its decision to reject the appeals on both jurisdictional and merit-based grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:01:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 479 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110809</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the jurisdiction of the adjudicating Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) and dismissed the appeals challenging both jurisdiction and the impugned order regarding the import of goods under the DEEC Scheme in contravention of the EXIM Policy. The Tribunal&#039;s detailed analysis of the relevant notification and statutory provisions supported its decision to reject the appeals on both jurisdictional and merit-based grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>