<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 477 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110804</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the case, emphasizing the importance of upholding natural justice principles. The denial of cross-examination of witnesses without valid reasons was deemed a breach of natural justice, leading to the order being set aside. Additionally, the impermissible method of evidence appreciation, where the adjudicator did not personally assess the material, resulted in the order being remanded for re-adjudication. The Tribunal highlighted the necessity of giving appellants reasonable opportunities to present their case thoroughly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:49:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 477 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110804</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the case, emphasizing the importance of upholding natural justice principles. The denial of cross-examination of witnesses without valid reasons was deemed a breach of natural justice, leading to the order being set aside. Additionally, the impermissible method of evidence appreciation, where the adjudicator did not personally assess the material, resulted in the order being remanded for re-adjudication. The Tribunal highlighted the necessity of giving appellants reasonable opportunities to present their case thoroughly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>