https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110801 The Tribunal held that the fabrication of columns, beams, and purlins did not amount to manufacturing under the Central Excise Act, following legal precedents. The decision favored the appellants, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeals. This ruling aligned with previous Tribunal and Supreme Court judgments that established such fabrication activities did not meet the statutory definition of manufacturing. en-us Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:28:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110801 The Tribunal held that the fabrication of columns, beams, and purlins did not amount to manufacturing under the Central Excise Act, following legal precedents. The decision favored the appellants, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeals. This ruling aligned with previous Tribunal and Supreme Court judgments that established such fabrication activities did not meet the statutory definition of manufacturing. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110801