<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 256 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110800</link>
    <description>The court overturned the penalties imposed on the director of M/s. Hastings Mill for the company&#039;s failure to fulfill export obligations under the EPCG license. The court found that the authorities did not provide sufficient reasons to hold the director personally liable and criticized the lack of clarity in attributing responsibility. Emphasizing the need for concrete justifications and adherence to legal principles, the court ruled in favor of the director, highlighting the importance of establishing a clear link between a director&#039;s actions and the company&#039;s obligations when imposing penalties under the Foreign Trade Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 256 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110800</link>
      <description>The court overturned the penalties imposed on the director of M/s. Hastings Mill for the company&#039;s failure to fulfill export obligations under the EPCG license. The court found that the authorities did not provide sufficient reasons to hold the director personally liable and criticized the lack of clarity in attributing responsibility. Emphasizing the need for concrete justifications and adherence to legal principles, the court ruled in favor of the director, highlighting the importance of establishing a clear link between a director&#039;s actions and the company&#039;s obligations when imposing penalties under the Foreign Trade Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>