<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 255 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110799</link>
    <description>Complaints by the Registrar of Companies for alleged Companies Act contraventions were held within limitation because the period under section 469(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure began when the Registrar received communication of the inspection result. Where inspection of company books is conducted under section 209A(1)(ii) and a report is required under section 209A(6), the complainant&#039;s knowledge is linked to receipt of that report, not to the earlier inspection itself. On the facts, there was no proof of earlier knowledge, and the report reached the Registrar on 14-7-1993; complaints filed on 20-10-1993 were therefore timely.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:36:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 255 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110799</link>
      <description>Complaints by the Registrar of Companies for alleged Companies Act contraventions were held within limitation because the period under section 469(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure began when the Registrar received communication of the inspection result. Where inspection of company books is conducted under section 209A(1)(ii) and a report is required under section 209A(6), the complainant&#039;s knowledge is linked to receipt of that report, not to the earlier inspection itself. On the facts, there was no proof of earlier knowledge, and the report reached the Registrar on 14-7-1993; complaints filed on 20-10-1993 were therefore timely.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>