<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 337 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110788</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals by the Puri Group and Seaworld, overturning the judgments of the Single Judge and the CLB. The company petitions by the Sippy Group were dismissed as the court found no breach of fiduciary duty, oppression, or mismanagement. The parties were advised to pursue amicable separation through negotiation or legal actions as deemed necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:10:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 337 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110788</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals by the Puri Group and Seaworld, overturning the judgments of the Single Judge and the CLB. The company petitions by the Sippy Group were dismissed as the court found no breach of fiduciary duty, oppression, or mismanagement. The parties were advised to pursue amicable separation through negotiation or legal actions as deemed necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>