<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 445 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110780</link>
    <description>Tyres imported by a scooter manufacturer were treated as consumer goods, but the decisive question was whether the public notice permitting import of accessories, components, parts and spares for consumer durables by a manufacturer covered such tyres. Earlier decisions classifying tyres as consumer goods were not determinative because they did not address that public notice. Applying the principle accepted for parts of motor vehicles, the tribunal held the notice extended to the tyres in question. The tyres were therefore importable by the manufacturer without a licence, and confiscation under clause (d) of Section 111 did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:53:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 445 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110780</link>
      <description>Tyres imported by a scooter manufacturer were treated as consumer goods, but the decisive question was whether the public notice permitting import of accessories, components, parts and spares for consumer durables by a manufacturer covered such tyres. Earlier decisions classifying tyres as consumer goods were not determinative because they did not address that public notice. Applying the principle accepted for parts of motor vehicles, the tribunal held the notice extended to the tyres in question. The tyres were therefore importable by the manufacturer without a licence, and confiscation under clause (d) of Section 111 did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>