<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 442 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110775</link>
    <description>Customs tariff classification must be determined by applying the relevant chapter and section notes, including exclusions for goods of general use and the rules governing parts of machinery. Classification cannot rest only on the fact that an article is specially shaped to fit a machine, because the tariff contains specific exceptions that must be examined first. Where the appellate authority does not address the assessee&#039;s specific classification objections, the order lacks proper reasoning on material issues and is not a speaking order. The impugned classification order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:40:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 442 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110775</link>
      <description>Customs tariff classification must be determined by applying the relevant chapter and section notes, including exclusions for goods of general use and the rules governing parts of machinery. Classification cannot rest only on the fact that an article is specially shaped to fit a machine, because the tariff contains specific exceptions that must be examined first. Where the appellate authority does not address the assessee&#039;s specific classification objections, the order lacks proper reasoning on material issues and is not a speaking order. The impugned classification order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>