<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 331 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110772</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court remanded the matter back to the Company Law Board to execute the order dated 19th August 1999 in accordance with the principles of law and the judgment&#039;s opinion. The appeals were allowed, and the CLB was tasked with completing the implementation of the order, ensuring the parties received the benefits of the decree. There was no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 331 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110772</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court remanded the matter back to the Company Law Board to execute the order dated 19th August 1999 in accordance with the principles of law and the judgment&#039;s opinion. The appeals were allowed, and the CLB was tasked with completing the implementation of the order, ensuring the parties received the benefits of the decree. There was no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>