https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110764 Section 483 of the Companies Act was considered in relation to an order of conviction and fine passed under section 454(5) in winding-up proceedings. The High Court read section 483 as permitting appeals from orders made in the matter of winding up, but only on the same appellate footing as orders of the High Court in its ordinary jurisdiction. Because the impugned order arose from the Company Judge's criminal jurisdiction, the court held that the Letters Patent bar against appeals from a Single Judge in criminal matters continued to apply. Section 483 was therefore not treated as creating an appeal where the governing criminal appellate route was unavailable, and the appeal was held not maintainable. en-us Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:23:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110764 Section 483 of the Companies Act was considered in relation to an order of conviction and fine passed under section 454(5) in winding-up proceedings. The High Court read section 483 as permitting appeals from orders made in the matter of winding up, but only on the same appellate footing as orders of the High Court in its ordinary jurisdiction. Because the impugned order arose from the Company Judge's criminal jurisdiction, the court held that the Letters Patent bar against appeals from a Single Judge in criminal matters continued to apply. Section 483 was therefore not treated as creating an appeal where the governing criminal appellate route was unavailable, and the appeal was held not maintainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110764