https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110761 Development Control Regulation 58 of 2001, as clarified in 2003, was construed as a special planning code balancing rehabilitation of sick mills, workers' interests, housing and open-space needs; land after demolition was not treated as ordinary "open land," and sub-regulation (6) did not apply to sick industries unless sickness was determined within the BIFR framework. The regulation and clarification were upheld as within delegated power under the planning statute and not unconstitutional. Sales of National Textile Corporation mill lands completed under the revival process were not contrary to the BIFR scheme or court orders, and the petitioners' serious delay and laches also weighed against relief. en-us Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110761 Development Control Regulation 58 of 2001, as clarified in 2003, was construed as a special planning code balancing rehabilitation of sick mills, workers' interests, housing and open-space needs; land after demolition was not treated as ordinary "open land," and sub-regulation (6) did not apply to sick industries unless sickness was determined within the BIFR framework. The regulation and clarification were upheld as within delegated power under the planning statute and not unconstitutional. Sales of National Textile Corporation mill lands completed under the revival process were not contrary to the BIFR scheme or court orders, and the petitioners' serious delay and laches also weighed against relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110761